From: Brian Davis <bdavis@thepoint.net>
To: Duncan Frissell <frissell@panix.com>
Message Hash: c37c883ed398696597ef86e1491eb2cac6527ebd8aa004b86fd46dcd62328fbc
Message ID: <Pine.D-G.3.91.950914143225.1918G-100000@dg.thepoint.net>
Reply To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.950914054153.8806C-100000@panix.com>
UTC Datetime: 1995-09-14 18:29:46 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 14 Sep 95 11:29:46 PDT
From: Brian Davis <bdavis@thepoint.net>
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 95 11:29:46 PDT
To: Duncan Frissell <frissell@panix.com>
Subject: Re: cryptography eliminates lawyers?
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.950914054153.8806C-100000@panix.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.D-G.3.91.950914143225.1918G-100000@dg.thepoint.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
On Thu, 14 Sep 1995, Duncan Frissell wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 13 Sep 1995, Black Unicorn wrote:
>
> > But won't clients insist on proper credentials in one form or another?
> > Doesn't the practicality and accountability of a centralized authority
> > (or several authorities) provide the best answer to this? Who is going
> > to accept my signature promising that I did indeed get a law degree and
> > pass the bar?
>
> An educational institution can certify its own graduates --- it does
> now. Competing credentialing institutions is exactly what I would be
> looking for as opposed to today's coercive monoply.
>
> No matter how skilled, it is illegal for an unlicensed person to practice
> law, medicine, or many other professions in any state. The nets weaken
> these restrictions because they allow action at a distance.
>
That's certainly true. But what about liability insurance? That's one
of the key aspects of my retention of a professional. Being cynical, and
somewhat knowledgable about human error, I want to be sure there's
someone to turn to if the advice/treatment/whatever turns out not only to
be wrong in hindsight, but in foresight.
Having taken, and passed, bar exams in three states (3 for 3 for those of
you thinking I was forum shopping), I can tell you that they weren't that
big of a barrier. You can flunk (over several tries) by failing to
prepare at all, panicking, being an extremely poor test taker, or, well ...
> Note the other effects of the nets. They make it hard to tell that you
> *are* working which reduces the impact of regulations of work by
> "illegal aliens." Thus if I am wandering through the South of France
> while writing the 'Great American Novel' I am unlikely to get busted for
> violation of work restrictions. The nets expand the number of jobs I
> can do while innocently wandering the South of France. I can or will
> soon be able, for example, to manage a large international corporation
> from anywhere.
>
> DCF
>
> "Who actually prefers Le Massif Central to those hot and crowded southern
> climes."
>
Just wondering about liability issues after state accrediting is dead.
EBD
Not a lawyer on the Net, although I play one in real life.
**********************************************************
Flame away! I get treated worse in person every day!!
Return to September 1995
Return to “terrell@sam.neosoft.com (Buford Terrell)”