1995-09-14 - Re: cryptography eliminates lawyers?

Header Data

From: Brian Davis <bdavis@thepoint.net>
To: Duncan Frissell <frissell@panix.com>
Message Hash: c37c883ed398696597ef86e1491eb2cac6527ebd8aa004b86fd46dcd62328fbc
Message ID: <Pine.D-G.3.91.950914143225.1918G-100000@dg.thepoint.net>
Reply To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.950914054153.8806C-100000@panix.com>
UTC Datetime: 1995-09-14 18:29:46 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 14 Sep 95 11:29:46 PDT

Raw message

From: Brian Davis <bdavis@thepoint.net>
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 95 11:29:46 PDT
To: Duncan Frissell <frissell@panix.com>
Subject: Re: cryptography eliminates lawyers?
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.950914054153.8806C-100000@panix.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.D-G.3.91.950914143225.1918G-100000@dg.thepoint.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


On Thu, 14 Sep 1995, Duncan Frissell wrote:

> 
> 
> On Wed, 13 Sep 1995, Black Unicorn wrote:
> 
> > But won't clients insist on proper credentials in one form or another?  
> > Doesn't the practicality and accountability of a centralized authority 
> > (or several authorities) provide the best answer to this?  Who is going 
> > to accept my signature promising that I did indeed get a law degree and 
> > pass the bar?
> 
> An educational institution can certify its own graduates --- it does 
> now.  Competing credentialing institutions is exactly what I would be 
> looking for as opposed to today's coercive monoply.  
> 
> No matter how skilled, it is illegal for an unlicensed person to practice 
> law, medicine, or many other professions in any state.  The nets weaken 
> these restrictions because they allow action at a distance.
>
That's certainly true.  But what about liability insurance?  That's one 
of the key aspects of my retention of a professional.  Being cynical, and 
somewhat knowledgable about human error, I want to be sure there's 
someone to turn to if the advice/treatment/whatever turns out not only to 
be wrong in hindsight, but in foresight.

Having taken, and passed, bar exams in three states (3 for 3 for those of 
you thinking I was forum shopping), I can tell you that they weren't that 
big of a barrier.  You can flunk (over several tries) by failing to 
prepare at all, panicking, being an extremely poor test taker, or, well ...
 
> Note the other effects of the nets.  They make it hard to tell that you 
> *are* working which reduces the impact of regulations of work by 
> "illegal aliens."  Thus if I am wandering through the South of France 
> while writing the 'Great American Novel' I am unlikely to get busted for 
> violation of work restrictions.  The nets expand the number of jobs I 
> can do while innocently wandering the South of France.  I can or will 
> soon be able, for example, to manage a large international corporation 
> from anywhere.
> 
> DCF
> 
> "Who actually prefers Le Massif Central to those hot and crowded southern 
> climes." 
> 
Just wondering about liability issues after state accrediting is dead.

EBD

Not a lawyer on the Net, although I play one in real life.
**********************************************************
Flame away! I get treated worse in person every day!!






Thread