From: hallam@w3.org
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: c4909bcf93cfe232a804d3977c777b2bdc6d493f832957ad36b65534fe9b3f7d
Message ID: <9509080010.AA06896@zorch.w3.org>
Reply To: <8921.9509071941@exe.dcs.exeter.ac.uk>
UTC Datetime: 1995-09-08 00:14:46 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 7 Sep 95 17:14:46 PDT
From: hallam@w3.org
Date: Thu, 7 Sep 95 17:14:46 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: GAK Hacks
In-Reply-To: <8921.9509071941@exe.dcs.exeter.ac.uk>
Message-ID: <9509080010.AA06896@zorch.w3.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
>One of their requirements was resistance to static patches, as someone
>else pointed out that is just not possible in software, if some gets
>really bored they can at worst disassemble the entire thing, and
>re-write it from scratch without any silly GAK stuff, or with a row of
>00s where the escrowed key goes.
I think I would prefer the escrowed key to a row of 00's, if someone wanted to
use decode the message they could just use the all 00's key :-)
Phill
Return to September 1995
Return to “hallam@w3.org”