1995-09-06 - Re: Growth of actions definded as crime. Which math formula?

Header Data

From: shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green)
To: Black Unicorn <unicorn@access.digex.net>
Message Hash: c640ae7b9dd00515585f37472eb67968dde2ebe75dc447c559a551a2d93a0851
Message ID: <v02120d0fac72f40a1ca9@[192.0.2.1]>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1995-09-06 05:57:13 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 5 Sep 95 22:57:13 PDT

Raw message

From: shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green)
Date: Tue, 5 Sep 95 22:57:13 PDT
To: Black Unicorn <unicorn@access.digex.net>
Subject: Re: Growth of actions definded as crime. Which math formula?
Message-ID: <v02120d0fac72f40a1ca9@[192.0.2.1]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


At 23:56 9/5/95, Black Unicorn wrote:
rypted mail preferred.
>
>Really it's hard to answer this because what constitutes a "NEW" act is a
>real question in and of itself.
>
>For example, wire fraud.  Is it a "NEW" crime?  Or just a subset of
>fraud, or mail fraud?

If they guy would have gotten away before the new law was passed, it is a
new crime.

That's the stats I am looking for.

-- Lucky Green <mailto:shamrock@netcom.com>
   PGP encrypted mail preferred.







Thread