From: Rich Salz <rsalz@osf.org>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: ddf9529d81fb22668c2d5a284925077ffa6c5d2f4ec28ed1ee2624f48db0261f
Message ID: <9509151512.AA08301@sulphur.osf.org>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1995-09-15 15:13:26 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 15 Sep 95 08:13:26 PDT
From: Rich Salz <rsalz@osf.org>
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 95 08:13:26 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Linking = Showing = Transferring?
Message-ID: <9509151512.AA08301@sulphur.osf.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
> I think this case is safer than the porn one, because the actual data
> in this case is legal in both jurisdictions, it just must not be
> transferred from jurisdiction US -> jurisdiction non-US, which it has
> not been.
I believe you're right, this is the key distinction which I missed.
(Disregard my earlier email to you :)
Thanks for the patient explanation.
/r$
Return to September 1995
Return to “Rich Salz <rsalz@osf.org>”
1995-09-15 (Fri, 15 Sep 95 08:13:26 PDT) - Re: Linking = Showing = Transferring? - Rich Salz <rsalz@osf.org>