1995-09-21 - Re: [NOISE] “hacker” was: first virtual “security”

Header Data

From: “NSB’s Portable (via RadioMail)” <nsb@radiomail.net>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: e73025d31a46bd98096e0b82acd91ffd8cd7c50895962f6fb82f368bd7330581
Message ID: <RM:c0d83d13.000a7f74.0>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1995-09-21 16:05:31 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 21 Sep 95 09:05:31 PDT

Raw message

From: "NSB's Portable (via RadioMail)" <nsb@radiomail.net>
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 95 09:05:31 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: [NOISE] "hacker" was: first virtual "security"
Message-ID: <RM:c0d83d13.000a7f74.0>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


At  2:03 AM 9/21/95 -0400, Ian Goldberg wrote:
>In article <0kMA2EqMc50eMEb4Yx@nsb.fv.com>,
>Nathaniel Borenstein  <nsb@nsb.fv.com> wrote:
>>If an SSL-like scheme were in wide use world-wide, the hacker who just
>>made a name for himself by breaking SSL could instead have gone down in
>
>Ugh.  That word again.  I'm only 22, but I'm old enough to remember
>when there were people called "crackers", and being called a "hacker"
>was a _good_ thing.

Hey, this guy didn't steal anything, and he publicized the hole.  He wasn't
a criminal, he was a good guy.  That's why I called him a hacker.  -- NB





Thread