1995-09-06 - Re: SUMMARY: Not-so-volatile volatile memory

Header Data

From: alt@iquest.net (Al Thompson)
To: mail2news@utopia.hacktic.nl
Message Hash: ef19d2f7c76acd8c3ebeaad77679fe324ae154d934491364881795aaab457c53
Message ID: <m0sqBq5-00063yC@dorite1.iquest.net>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1995-09-06 04:12:02 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 5 Sep 95 21:12:02 PDT

Raw message

From: alt@iquest.net (Al Thompson)
Date: Tue, 5 Sep 95 21:12:02 PDT
To: mail2news@utopia.hacktic.nl
Subject: Re: SUMMARY: Not-so-volatile volatile memory
Message-ID: <m0sqBq5-00063yC@dorite1.iquest.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


At 11:54 AM 9/5/95 +0200, Anonymous wrote:
>
>Is this a new discovery?  When I used to work with DOD classified
>data, not so long ago, disk drives had to be declassified using an
>approved program, such as Norton Utilities' "WIPEINFO".  (That was
>approved up through the SECRET/SAR level, anyway.  I don't know
>about TS/SCI/SI.)  But those same regulations said that RAM was
>considered declassified within a certain time (30 seconds, I think)
>after power was removed.  (That time figure was UNclassified, BTW.)
>I think it was just to allow time for the voltage to bleed off of
>the power supply's filter capacitors, and not related to the
>relative volatility of DRAM.
  
I worked at a DoD contractor for a while, and there was a DoD-approved 
method of disposing of hard drives, which was expensive, laborious,
and rather silly.
 
We just had two witnesses watch as we smashed it to smithereens 
(technical term) with a sledge hammer, and then handed the parts over
to an approved disposal person (trash man).
 
It's JUST that easy.
 







Thread