1995-09-15 - Re: CYPHERPUNK considered harmful
Header Data
From: Jeff Barber <jeffb@sware.com>
To: dcl@panix.com (David C. Lambert)
Message Hash: f075c021b2a4f44500dc6dea5706f83d50d45c2598bc5021b8fba323ccda201d
Message ID: <9509152105.AA18280@wombat.sware.com>
Reply To: <199509152013.QAA18005@panix.com>
UTC Datetime: 1995-09-15 21:07:01 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 15 Sep 95 14:07:01 PDT
Raw message
From: Jeff Barber <jeffb@sware.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 95 14:07:01 PDT
To: dcl@panix.com (David C. Lambert)
Subject: Re: CYPHERPUNK considered harmful
In-Reply-To: <199509152013.QAA18005@panix.com>
Message-ID: <9509152105.AA18280@wombat.sware.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
David C. Lambert writes:
> Peter Trei <trei@process.com> wrote:
>
> > Terms like 'cypherpunk' and 'cryptoanarchy' tend to pigeonhole us as
> > nutcases for many people, and are a barrier to getting our ideas
> > across.
> Shows you what we're up against.
>
> BTW, I'm not for changing the name of the list, but I do see the logic
> in a more establishment-friendly name to use when lobbying the public.
How about "civil libertarian" then?
-- Jeff
Thread
Return to September 1995
- Return to “Black Unicorn <unicorn@polaris.mindport.net>”
- Return to ““David C. Lambert” <dcl@panix.com>”
Return to “Jeff Barber <jeffb@sware.com>”
- 1995-09-15 (Fri, 15 Sep 95 13:36:37 PDT) - Re: CYPHERPUNK considered harmful - “David C. Lambert” <dcl@panix.com>
- 1995-09-15 (Fri, 15 Sep 95 14:07:01 PDT) - Re: CYPHERPUNK considered harmful - Jeff Barber <jeffb@sware.com>
- 1995-09-16 (Sat, 16 Sep 95 09:00:01 PDT) - Re: CYPHERPUNK considered harmful - Black Unicorn <unicorn@polaris.mindport.net>