From: paul@poboy.b17c.ingr.com (Paul Robichaux)
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 95 06:55:15 PDT
To: perry@piermont.com
Subject: Re: Cylink
In-Reply-To: <199509201328.JAA04874@frankenstein.piermont.com>
Message-ID: <199509201343.AA12329@poboy.b17c.ingr.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----


> Andrew Loewenstern writes:
> > Any ideas on how this will change the legal status of RSAREF and PGP?

Then Perry Metzger replied:
> I'm much more interested in how this changes the legal status of the
> D-H derived encryption systems like ElGamal, and how it alters the
> patent status on the DSS, which is basically also derived from the
> same root.

What I'm waiting to see is who sues RSADSI for recovery of royalties
paid to Cylink. Imagine how Apple, Lotus, and all of the other
bigcorps using RSA must feel right about now: they licensed a patent
from the wrong people, and it appears that RSADSI may have known that
their rights had expired.

What about Roger Schlafly's suit? Anything new on it?

- -Paul

- -- 
Paul Robichaux, KD4JZG       | "Things are much simpler and less stressful
perobich@ingr.com            |  when you don't look to the law to fix things."
Not speaking for Intergraph  |      - Tim May (tcmay@got.net) on cypherpunks
		 Be a cryptography user. Ask me how.


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2

iQCVAwUBMGAajKfb4pLe9tolAQG8dwP+Mt8frNZVf87eQOlpIGZ0V7fJDD1CoLSg
6yt6inPeTcjUK52rYLV4ut2hm2q7yASsGi2PlXm+oXh9gi5rCjCNClR8ffRI/f3Z
PklwDT+KYm9XB9pJfDPJXzVf9jevY7Ge+m4QBFWymXiQ3DLhsu+Mh8kijTO47uJ9
rZHjHPFjBEo=
=UAqt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----