1995-09-13 - Re: NYT on GAK
Header Data
From: nobody@REPLAY.COM (Anonymous)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: fda107e7e40dd463a5365d1ddd97720d58b7b4cb50cc5c537c1906fa53530d01
Message ID: <199509130710.JAA26140@utopia.hacktic.nl>
Reply To: <199509111316.JAA02859@pipe2.nyc.pipeline.com>
UTC Datetime: 1995-09-13 07:10:27 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 13 Sep 95 00:10:27 PDT
Raw message
From: nobody@REPLAY.COM (Anonymous)
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 95 00:10:27 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: NYT on GAK
In-Reply-To: <199509111316.JAA02859@pipe2.nyc.pipeline.com>
Message-ID: <199509130710.JAA26140@utopia.hacktic.nl>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Adam Shostack <adam@bwh.harvard.edu> wrote:
> Its a good thing the administration only wants to outlaw
> cryptography, not anonymity.
But you can't have strong anonymity without strong cryptography.
Thread
Return to September 1995
- Return to “Adam Shostack <adam@bwh.harvard.edu>”
- Return to “John Young <jya@pipeline.com>”
Return to “nobody@REPLAY.COM (Anonymous)”
- 1995-09-11 (Mon, 11 Sep 95 06:17:00 PDT) - NYT on GAK - John Young <jya@pipeline.com>
- 1995-09-11 (Mon, 11 Sep 95 10:13:49 PDT) - Re: NYT on GAK - Adam Shostack <adam@bwh.harvard.edu>
- 1995-09-13 (Wed, 13 Sep 95 00:10:27 PDT) - Re: NYT on GAK - nobody@REPLAY.COM (Anonymous)