From: guthery@austin.sar.slb.com
To: rah@shipwright.com
Message Hash: 0a648d19c1b6ebba0427d61c4666288ffea5ff345c412e15c0a8f5718f11b5db
Message ID: <9510250820.AA05781@asterix>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1995-10-25 08:20:25 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 25 Oct 95 01:20:25 PDT
From: guthery@austin.sar.slb.com
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 95 01:20:25 PDT
To: rah@shipwright.com
Subject: IT View of Worldwide Electronic Commerce Conference
Message-ID: <9510250820.AA05781@asterix>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Robert Hettinga wonders ...
>Did anyone go to the
>
>"Worldwide Electronic Commerce Law, Policy, Security and Controls Conference" ?
>
>It was in Bethesda October 18 - 20.
>
>Just curious. Sponsored by a lot of Big Cheese (ABA, HLS, NIST, UNCITL,
>SPA, ETC, ETC, ETC).
I did and here's a view from IT; i.e. not law or marketing. The conference
was two-track so by definition I only attended 1/2 the sessions.
The high points ...
- the Web will support commerce next year from modest (multi-$1,000)
down to micro (sub-penny) transactions
- the U.S. Government is trying to trade 64-bit keys for
escrow but folks aren't buying it; Dorthy Denning gave
a very weak "the sky is falling" talk.
- Intel is building systems and secure infrastructure software;
Microsoft may start to feel trapped between Intel and Netscape.
- current copyright law seems up to the task of handling the Web but
contract law may need some updating
- iris scanning seems to be the leading biometric; there is a PCMCIA
card that does fingerprints including pores which I learned are
better than ridges for identification
- nobody had any insight on transnational data flow, encrypted
or otherwise
- Verisign (a spin-off of RSA) is selling Digital IDs and running a
Certification Authority; see
http://www.verisign.com
- the Swedes have a very aggressive Digital ID system on the air;
see
http://www.cost.se
- X.509 seems to be the de facto and de jure certificate standard;
current work is at ftp://NC-17.MA02.Bull.com in
/pub/OSIdirectory/Certificates
- RSA for encryption and DSA for signatures were the encryption
technologies of preference; PGP was occassionally acknowledged
to be one of the best available but strangely went undiscussed.
Good quote: "Commercial DES (for export) with 40 bit keys is a
joke. Don't even think about it."
- other relevant URLs:
www.ms.com
www.terisa.com
www.ssa.gov
Most of the security focus of the conference was on authentication.
Return to October 1995
Return to “guthery@austin.sar.slb.com”
1995-10-25 (Wed, 25 Oct 95 01:20:25 PDT) - IT View of Worldwide Electronic Commerce Conference - guthery@austin.sar.slb.com