From: sameer <sameer@c2.org>
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 95 00:04:46 PDT
To: mark@lochard.com.au (Mark)
Subject: Re: Hal's Third Challenge?
In-Reply-To: <199510102312.AA37668@junkers.lochard.com.au>
Message-ID: <199510110659.XAA28427@infinity.c2.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


> IMHO we owe Netscape some counter pr against m$, we've proved our point to
> Netscape and they performed admirally by being open and responsible to the
> net.community. Whilst it didnt seem to dent their share value, they did cop

	<yawn> This is old news. http://www.c2.org/hackmsoft/ has been
around for multiple weeks now.

> some bad press (and some media weenies still think their product is broken)
> because of the groups efforts. What goads me is m$ trying to use this in
> their press dealing and acting like this is entirely different from their
> situation. Seems to me they need it proved to them that because of their
> proprietary attitude they are in a worse position. In short bring them down
> to earth and serve their ego to them on a plate.
> 
> Cheers,
> Mark
> mark@lochard.com.au
> The above opinions are rumoured to be mine.
> 


-- 
sameer						Voice:   510-601-9777
Community ConneXion				FAX:	 510-601-9734
The Internet Privacy Provider			Dialin:  510-658-6376
http://www.c2.org (or login as "guest")			sameer@c2.org