From: s1113645@tesla.cc.uottawa.ca
To: “J. Kent Hastings” <zeus@pinsight.com>
Message Hash: 21570afd63eb4098e85845e2223cc8918326cce53e7687f2ddad2da50ef11726
Message ID: <Pine.3.89.9510291907.A27468-0100000@tesla.cc.uottawa.ca>
Reply To: <199510292336.PAA31401@chico.pinsight.com>
UTC Datetime: 1995-10-30 01:19:02 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 30 Oct 1995 09:19:02 +0800
From: s1113645@tesla.cc.uottawa.ca
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 1995 09:19:02 +0800
To: "J. Kent Hastings" <zeus@pinsight.com>
Subject: [noise] Re: Quebec Libre
In-Reply-To: <199510292336.PAA31401@chico.pinsight.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.3.89.9510291907.A27468-0100000@tesla.cc.uottawa.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
On Sun, 29 Oct 1995, J. Kent Hastings wrote:
> -- [ From: J. Kent Hastings * EMC.Ver #2.5.02 ] --
>
> Cpunx, especially offshore banking "fonts of wisdom,"
> A friend asks:
> > Concerning Quebec Libre, I would love to establish residence there before
> the
> > separation (not necessarily physical residence). Have these fonts of
> wisdom
> > on St. Louis and Anguilla banking anything on getting Quebec residency,
> mail
> > services, and bank accounts?
>
> Any plans if Quebec secedes?
Canada has a tax treaty with the States. Quebec wants to US permission
to stay within NAFTA (and the States have already stated this will not be
automatic). Similarly the PQ also wants to stay within other Canadian
international treaties.
I really don't see a separate Quebec becoming even a semblance of a tax
haven or being a hint less friendly to US interests than it is now.
We also have very high tax rates (and a bigger debt per cap) up here,
Quebec's being the worst of all. I do remind you that Canada (french or
english) is practically a political extension of the States.
Return to October 1995
Return to “s1113645@tesla.cc.uottawa.ca”