From: shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 22e714c0145ef1a4c27a5d5689ddb8a71b168739bc1352f68d960ccdda284f29
Message ID: <199510060409.AAA05305@book.hks.net>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1995-10-06 04:11:26 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 5 Oct 95 21:11:26 PDT
From: shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green)
Date: Thu, 5 Oct 95 21:11:26 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Certificates, Attributes, Web of Trust
Message-ID: <199510060409.AAA05305@book.hks.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
In article <ac9961b42202100433c4@[205.199.118.202]>, tcmay@got.net
(Timothy C. May) wrote:
[...]
> But I go further: a huge number of interesting applications of strong
> crypto have no connections at all with physical persons, let alone with
> True Names. Agents in computer transactions, applets fired across networks,
> agoric entities in computational ecologies, BlackNet sorts of markets, and
> on and on.
This is true. Some of the most interesting applications of crypto don't
involve True Names at all. The only reason, IMHO, why crypto is often
thought of in terms of communicating between two True Names is because it
is an obvious application to the layman. But it are the Blacknet type of
uses where crypto really shines.
- ---
[This message has been signed by an auto-signing service. A valid signature
means only that it has been received at the address corresponding to the
signature and forwarded.]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2
Comment: Gratis auto-signing service
iQBFAwUBMHSr6CoZzwIn1bdtAQECCAF+Jok52IdshM4nLGjwqiImzw93dy/zSy9E
QBmUR1yzX+17uuUoflSRE3R0bpx3uv+F
=UM4a
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Return to October 1995
Return to “shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green)”
1995-10-06 (Thu, 5 Oct 95 21:11:26 PDT) - Re: Certificates, Attributes, Web of Trust - shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green)