From: Simon Spero <ses@tipper.oit.unc.edu>
To: Sandy Sandfort <sandfort@crl.com>
Message Hash: 28c23631b105ab62a04184ee158fc7d1822c2c6c3626fa66b79356aa70b33738
Message ID: <Pine.SOL.3.91.951016203438.582A-100000@chivalry>
Reply To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.951016074023.1719B-100000@crl.crl.com>
UTC Datetime: 1995-10-17 03:34:53 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 16 Oct 95 20:34:53 PDT
From: Simon Spero <ses@tipper.oit.unc.edu>
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 95 20:34:53 PDT
To: Sandy Sandfort <sandfort@crl.com>
Subject: Re: transaction costs in anonymous markets
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.951016074023.1719B-100000@crl.crl.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.SOL.3.91.951016203438.582A-100000@chivalry>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
On Mon, 16 Oct 1995, Sandy Sandfort wrote:
>
> This is only true if you assume everyone will do their own
> reputation evaluation. This is a third-party insurer problem,
> really. Either a "Lloyds of London" or a "Good Housekeeping"
> model would do the trick.
>
Actually, this sounds a lot closer to someone like S&P or some other
rating agency.
Simon
------
(defun modexpt (x y n) "computes (x^y) mod n"
(cond ((= y 0) 1) ((= y 1) (mod x n))
((evenp y) (mod (expt (modexpt x (/ y 2) n) 2) n))
(t (mod (* x (modexpt x (1- y) n)) n))))
Return to October 1995
Return to “Wei Dai <weidai@eskimo.com>”