From: “Peter Trei” <trei@process.com>
To: <cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 3f5701693b2c56732a5a04bc3d56eec34e8ffc6c7938002bad980f5adbb9a598
Message ID: <9510021610.AA00160@toad.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1995-10-02 16:10:05 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 2 Oct 95 09:10:05 PDT
From: "Peter Trei" <trei@process.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Oct 95 09:10:05 PDT
To: <cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Yet Another "(Fwd) Internet Euro-Clipper"
Message-ID: <9510021610.AA00160@toad.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
> At 5:12 PM 9/29/95, Peter Trei wrote:
> >Subject: European Governments Agree to Ban Strong Crypto
> The biggest problem I have with this is that this is the third, fourth, or
> fifth posting of Ross Anderson's piece to this list [...]
> I urge people to read what's on the list and not repost things which have
> already appeared. If they don't have time to read all of the messages on
> the list, which is understandable, then they need to be even more careful
> in posting things.
Reading the list does not neccesarily help - I experience a several hour lag between when
I post something, and when it comes back from the list server. Thus, even if I'm all
caught up on my reading the list (as I was when I posted that article), articles may be 'in the
pipe' which duplicate ones I'm thinking of posting.
For those curious about the latency, I'm posting this at 12:08, on the US east coast.
How long did it take to reach you?
>
> Not to pick on Peter Trei, as this happens all the time, whenever a hot
> issue appears.
Short of implementing some content-sensitive form of CSMA/CD, I don't see what we
can do (but lowering the list latency would help a lot).
> --Tim May
Peter Trei
Senior Software Engineer
Purveyor Development Team
Process Software Corporation
http://www.process.com
trei@process.com
Return to October 1995
Return to ““Peter Trei” <trei@process.com>”
1995-10-02 (Mon, 2 Oct 95 09:10:05 PDT) - Re: Yet Another “(Fwd) Internet Euro-Clipper” - “Peter Trei” <trei@process.com>