1995-10-27 - Re: CJR returned to sender

Header Data

From: sameer <sameer@c2.org>
To: tcmay@got.net (Timothy C. May)
Message Hash: 449620a5b037f01b79d9b08a6ad9ec46d7cbdf1c1b3dad1ac3ef0eb4e44ec293
Message ID: <199510261708.KAA01761@infinity.c2.org>
Reply To: <acb4fe74070210047537@[205.199.118.202]>
UTC Datetime: 1995-10-27 07:05:48 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 27 Oct 1995 15:05:48 +0800

Raw message

From: sameer <sameer@c2.org>
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 1995 15:05:48 +0800
To: tcmay@got.net (Timothy C. May)
Subject: Re: CJR returned to sender
In-Reply-To: <acb4fe74070210047537@[205.199.118.202]>
Message-ID: <199510261708.KAA01761@infinity.c2.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


> * "RSA in Perl," even in machine-readable form. I would not block export of
> it, as it is not a "usable system" (no key management, unwieldy to use).
> The proof of the pudding: how many people are using "RSA in Perl" to
> actually communicate? How many Pablo Escobars or Saddam Husseins are likely
> to ever use it?

	They have, however (apparently) blocked export of the
"snuffle" source code, which is 10 lines of C. Is snuffle, in its 10
lines of C a "usable system"? I would imagine not.

-- 
sameer						Voice:   510-601-9777
Community ConneXion				FAX:     510-601-9734
The Internet Privacy Provider			Dialin:  510-658-6376
http://www.c2.org (or login as "guest")			sameer@c2.org





Thread