From: “P.J. Ponder” <ponder@wane-leon-mail.scri.fsu.edu>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 4de5cc82d60f7cfbc3eeb6cc1dc826b26fe82f905faf6cea460f1861a60383ea
Message ID: <Pine.3.89.9510242313.E16314-0100000@wane3.scri.fsu.edu>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1995-10-25 04:29:15 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 24 Oct 95 21:29:15 PDT
From: "P.J. Ponder" <ponder@wane-leon-mail.scri.fsu.edu>
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 95 21:29:15 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: re: Remailer-in-a-Box, Everyone a Remailer
Message-ID: <Pine.3.89.9510242313.E16314-0100000@wane3.scri.fsu.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
I think someone claiming to be Jay Campbell wrote:
>Rather, a single physical machine site can and should be able to run many
>remailers, out of user accounts. (Accounts on systems like Sameer's C2. Or
>Hal's remailer running on Portal. Or maybe some of the Mixmaster clients.)
>This also brings up the idea of 'opportunistic remailers' again (somebody
>gimme a snazzy name for that) - a PC/Mac-based SMTPish server that isn't
how about pop-ups? This has a real future, I think. It would be easy
enough to leave one's pc logged in for a while (maybe even earn a little
ebread with it?) and forward some mail around, after checking with the
server to see if there were any new messages for the cypherpunks password
screen saver or any anon posts to be remailed.
--
pj
p.s. seems like the list is gettign a little hard-edged as TCMay pointed
out recently. Everybody jumping on everyone else, and on their products,
too. I want secure and powerful tools, too. But it seems liek a feeding
frenzy. And as soon as someone posts on something a little askew, right
back come the replies to cut the shit and get back on the topic.
I say lighten up. <EOF>
Return to October 1995
Return to ““P.J. Ponder” <ponder@wane-leon-mail.scri.fsu.edu>”
1995-10-25 (Tue, 24 Oct 95 21:29:15 PDT) - re: Remailer-in-a-Box, Everyone a Remailer - “P.J. Ponder” <ponder@wane-leon-mail.scri.fsu.edu>