From: Rich Salz <rsalz@osf.org>
To: owner-cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 55fe3d58add8bd0a61efb12e77efb76b81adfe96d2c8b4d082a9e1d6e30b6919
Message ID: <9510030308.AA10671@sulphur.osf.org>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1995-10-03 03:09:41 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 2 Oct 95 20:09:41 PDT
From: Rich Salz <rsalz@osf.org>
Date: Mon, 2 Oct 95 20:09:41 PDT
To: owner-cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Certificate proposal & X509 clarifications
Message-ID: <9510030308.AA10671@sulphur.osf.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
> Therefore, you
>have to get someone owning an OBJID tree branch to define meanings for you
>- -- and you have to publish some worldwide book of mappings, etc.
While I am no big fan of OID's (and I really dislike ASN.1 -- and nobody
ever explained to my why the ISO RPC standard doesn't use it), if
anybody really needs an ISO OID tree, I will probably be willing to
tear off a piece of OSF's:
1.3.22
{ iso(1) identified-org(3) osf(22) }
Return to October 1995
Return to “Rich Salz <rsalz@osf.org>”
1995-10-03 (Mon, 2 Oct 95 20:09:41 PDT) - Re: Certificate proposal & X509 clarifications - Rich Salz <rsalz@osf.org>