From: Bill Sommerfeld <sommerfeld@orchard.medford.ma.us>
To: jim@acm.org
Message Hash: 5c65906bcffb1bd0b433e491dc9b2807bdc8f8f38283a78a7b89c18345050919
Message ID: <199510161311.NAA06302@orchard.medford.ma.us>
Reply To: <199510160257.TAA23550@mycroft.rand.org>
UTC Datetime: 1995-10-16 13:27:13 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 16 Oct 95 06:27:13 PDT
From: Bill Sommerfeld <sommerfeld@orchard.medford.ma.us>
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 95 06:27:13 PDT
To: jim@acm.org
Subject: Re: Why commercial key escrow? [Re: My chat with Goeff Greiveldinger]
In-Reply-To: <199510160257.TAA23550@mycroft.rand.org>
Message-ID: <199510161311.NAA06302@orchard.medford.ma.us>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> As a data point, Dorothy Denning is increasingly pessimistic that
> this plan will in fact result in the same weak or escrowed system
> being used domestically; if it doesn't, that presumably triggers
> Louis Freeh to head back to the Hill for more legislation.
Yup, those of us who already paid the up-front cost to build two
versions of our products are not about to *weaken* our domestic
version just to go back to having only one version.
- Bill
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.1
iQCVAwUBMIJZO7T+rHlVUGpxAQGJJwQAgewBBehZWJMDN4gl2BBeZKEeQqpF86l5
GCqwXDcZEPjeFnNg4P2bIjHZ7UAu/DNMcABN8ZBmqusAkSEa28m3MFigIcTdnrO7
vKM8LuKj8rC95ig6hjJ20RitUF820BnQjRsIBQafa96J9rav1nZpX2UeZ8Ad9l6y
BfTjGVqAEig=
=zSSz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Return to October 1995
Return to “tcmay@got.net (Timothy C. May)”