From: “James A. Donald” <jamesd@echeque.com>
To: Thomas Grant Edwards <kelso@netcom.com>
Message Hash: 652a822af7f564080c9dd30d1352ff2e1d7b52ad3121b83232b9a9b44db27c1e
Message ID: <199510212249.PAA22804@blob.best.net>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1995-10-21 22:49:50 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 21 Oct 95 15:49:50 PDT
From: "James A. Donald" <jamesd@echeque.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Oct 95 15:49:50 PDT
To: Thomas Grant Edwards <kelso@netcom.com>
Subject: Re: Anonymity: A Modest Proposal
Message-ID: <199510212249.PAA22804@blob.best.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
At 12:59 PM 10/19/95 -0400, Thomas Grant Edwards wrote:
>This would require the remailer to examine entropy of messages passing
>through. Anything not random enough gets tossed.
A simple entropy measuring algorithm:
Generate N random pointers into a file. (or extract N random short
strings from the file)
Sort them into order of the strings,
Find the number of bits in common between one string and the
next string. Total up S, the number of bits in common
Calculate (N * lg N)/S
For an encrypted file, this quantity should be close to unity, because
the order in an encrypted file should not be easily detectable.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
|
We have the right to defend ourselves | http://www.jim.com/jamesd/
and our property, because of the kind |
of animals that we are. True law | James A. Donald
derives from this right, not from the |
arbitrary power of the state. | jamesd@echeque.com
Return to October 1995
Return to ““James A. Donald” <jamesd@echeque.com>”
1995-10-21 (Sat, 21 Oct 95 15:49:50 PDT) - Re: Anonymity: A Modest Proposal - “James A. Donald” <jamesd@echeque.com>