1995-10-21 - Re: faxes are not secure

Header Data

From: David Lesher <wb8foz@nrk.com>
To: an407769@anon.penet.fi
Message Hash: 6bf9d178ae841c1e6a5016d73f1b648f931e351cc48ce388da8471ea97dbc168
Message ID: <199510211634.MAA02770@nrk.com>
Reply To: <9510210219.AA22436@anon.penet.fi>
UTC Datetime: 1995-10-21 20:53:33 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 21 Oct 95 13:53:33 PDT

Raw message

From: David Lesher <wb8foz@nrk.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Oct 95 13:53:33 PDT
To: an407769@anon.penet.fi
Subject: Re: faxes are not secure
In-Reply-To: <9510210219.AA22436@anon.penet.fi>
Message-ID: <199510211634.MAA02770@nrk.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


> 
> BBC Discovers Faxes Are Not Secure (no shit, Sherlock)
> BLACKPOOL, LANCASHIRE, ENGLAND, 1995 OCT 19 (NB) -- The British Broadcasting
> Corporation (BBC) found out late last week that faxes are not a secure
> transmission system. 

Risks had a case where (If I recall correctly) Intel was one party or
the other. Seems there were two John Henry Smith's or such at the hotel
and the fax went to the worng one...

I suspected the "wrong" one was a plant by the competing firm.
That and $100.00 to a bellboy would ensure the result.

The question is, how can the 'Punks use this to promote encrypted email
instead of faxes?

-- 
A host is a host from coast to coast.................wb8foz@nrk.com
& no one will talk to a host that's close........[v].(301) 56-LINUX
Unless the host (that isn't close).........................pob 1433
is busy, hung or dead....................................20915-1433




Thread