From: Wei Dai <weidai@eskimo.com>
To: Cypherpunks <cypherpunks@toad.com>
Message Hash: 79beb0ddabc8478282fe9323d76d9313caa268a85f12608a33ed7c747e8af058
Message ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.951026184046.23045A-100000@eskimo.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1995-10-27 03:40:07 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 27 Oct 1995 11:40:07 +0800
From: Wei Dai <weidai@eskimo.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 1995 11:40:07 +0800
To: Cypherpunks <cypherpunks@toad.com>
Subject: idle CPU markets
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.951026184046.23045A-100000@eskimo.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
With many high speed personal computers on the Internet and the
deployment of low transaction cost Internet payment schemes, it seems
inevitable that markets for idle CPU cycles and memory will develop. An
interesting problem is to try to predict who this market will benefit,
and what the market will be used for.
So far it seems that cryptanalytic problems (e.g. factoring and brute
forcing of keys) have the highest marginal value/MIPS among problems
amenable to loosely coupled distributed computation. However, I think it
would be wasteful if the demand in idle CPU and memory markets were to be
dominated by cryptanalysts since (non-academic) cryptanalysis is basicly
a zero-sum game. When a key is broken, no wealth is created, rather it
is transfered from the owner of the key to the cryptanalyst.
What other problems would benefit from easy access to lots of distributed
CPU cycles?
Wei Dai
Return to October 1995
Return to “Wei Dai <weidai@eskimo.com>”