From: rschlafly@attmail.com (Roger Schlafly)
To: eli@UX3.SP.CS.CMU.EDU
Message Hash: 8570d9bf6a01cb32d83da6ae13b11f8a04b9d05ec77304050916f16d5ecfe684
Message ID: <rschlafly2871855540>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1995-10-14 18:56:14 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 14 Oct 95 11:56:14 PDT
From: rschlafly@attmail.com (Roger Schlafly)
Date: Sat, 14 Oct 95 11:56:14 PDT
To: eli@UX3.SP.CS.CMU.EDU
Subject: DSS patent license
Message-ID: <rschlafly2871855540>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
>>> RSA Data Security, Inc.
>>> today announced that it is now licensing patents for the Digital Signature
>>> Standard (DSS), the U.S. government standard for digital signatures.
>>
>> I believe someone was suing the U.S. government on the grounds that the
>> public signature standard wasn't supposed to require proprietary
>> technology. Has this gone anywhere yet?
>>
>> --
>> Eli Brandt
>> eli+@cs.cmu.edu
Yes, I had such a lawsuit. No, it didn't go anywhere in the courts,
but the feds did eventually cave in to the principal demand of my
suit: That the DSA patent be made available to anyone on a royalty-free
basis.
So how is it that RSADSI and Cylink/CKC claim you need licenses to
their patents to use DSS? Because they have other patents. I have
another lawsuit directed at those patents. Stay tuned.
Roger Schlafly
rschlafly@attmail.com
Return to October 1995
Return to “rschlafly@attmail.com (Roger Schlafly)”
1995-10-14 (Sat, 14 Oct 95 11:56:14 PDT) - DSS patent license - rschlafly@attmail.com (Roger Schlafly)