1995-10-18 - Re: Anonymity: A Modest Proposal

Header Data

From: Thomas Grant Edwards <tedwards@Glue.umd.edu>
To: s1018954@aix2.uottawa.ca
Message Hash: 8d98ee5060243a055df6ff6bd7a64d80b2142104b0cc848f85fdec40d4412ac6
Message ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.951018170545.15154A-100000@hertz.isr.umd.edu>
Reply To: <Pine.3.89.9510181440.A93842-0100000@aix2.uottawa.ca>
UTC Datetime: 1995-10-18 21:06:46 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 18 Oct 95 14:06:46 PDT

Raw message

From: Thomas Grant Edwards <tedwards@Glue.umd.edu>
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 95 14:06:46 PDT
To: s1018954@aix2.uottawa.ca
Subject: Re: Anonymity: A Modest Proposal
In-Reply-To: <Pine.3.89.9510181440.A93842-0100000@aix2.uottawa.ca>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.951018170545.15154A-100000@hertz.isr.umd.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


On Wed, 18 Oct 1995 s1018954@aix2.uottawa.ca wrote:

> Nah. I'll take it back. Send encrypted through usenet, receive 
> encrypted through usenet. Best of both, but very slow and only good for 
> voluntary mail reception. 

Not to mention a tremendous waste of bandwidth if people do it on a 
regular basis.

Philosophical question:  Is Usenet a "mix"?

-Thomas

Thread

• Return to October 1995

• Return to “s1018954@aix2.uottawa.ca”

• Return to “Thomas Grant Edwards <tedwards@Glue.umd.edu>”

• 1995-10-18 (Wed, 18 Oct 95 10:08:41 PDT) - Re: Anonymity: A Modest Proposal - s1018954@aix2.uottawa.ca
  • 1995-10-18 (Wed, 18 Oct 95 11:11:00 PDT) - Re: Anonymity: A Modest Proposal - s1018954@aix2.uottawa.ca
    • 1995-10-18 (Wed, 18 Oct 95 14:06:46 PDT) - Re: Anonymity: A Modest Proposal - Thomas Grant Edwards <tedwards@Glue.umd.edu>