1995-10-26 - symmetric key algorithms
Header Data
From: Goh Seow Hiong <shgoh@ncb.gov.sg>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 97f7c2f79abb49fd9b12a1615fbe9b3723f68c2335241164110463eedeed6e9b
Message ID: <Pine.3.89.9510261019.A29735-0100000@gallery.ncb.gov.sg>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1995-10-26 02:18:59 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 25 Oct 95 19:18:59 PDT
Raw message
From: Goh Seow Hiong <shgoh@ncb.gov.sg>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 95 19:18:59 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: symmetric key algorithms
Message-ID: <Pine.3.89.9510261019.A29735-0100000@gallery.ncb.gov.sg>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Could anyone comment on the acceptability and reliability of the
SAFER algorithm, in comparison with other algorithms such as IDEA,
Triple-DES, DES, RC4, .... Has there been any comparison paper
written on the pros and cons of the different symmetric key algorithms?
Thanks..
SH
Thread
Return to October 1995
- Return to “Adam Shostack <adam@lighthouse.homeport.org>”
Return to “Goh Seow Hiong <shgoh@ncb.gov.sg>”
- 1995-10-26 (Wed, 25 Oct 95 19:18:59 PDT) - symmetric key algorithms - Goh Seow Hiong <shgoh@ncb.gov.sg>
- 1995-10-27 (Fri, 27 Oct 1995 11:34:04 +0800) - Re: symmetric key algorithms - Adam Shostack <adam@lighthouse.homeport.org>