1995-10-16 - Re: Illegally canceled articles on Microsoft Security Bugs

Header Data

From: hallam@w3.org
To: anonymous@replay.com (Nobody in particular)
Message Hash: 9996fb6a6b4cbe5283111ddb74829a797ad25fbd3838be483fc72678326947c0
Message ID: <9510160300.AA27823@zorch.w3.org>
Reply To: <199510160231.TAA10813@Networking.Stanford.EDU>
UTC Datetime: 1995-10-16 03:00:49 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 15 Oct 95 20:00:49 PDT

Raw message

From: hallam@w3.org
Date: Sun, 15 Oct 95 20:00:49 PDT
To: anonymous@replay.com (Nobody in particular)
Subject: Re: Illegally canceled articles on Microsoft Security Bugs
In-Reply-To: <199510160231.TAA10813@Networking.Stanford.EDU>
Message-ID: <9510160300.AA27823@zorch.w3.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



Hi,

	I would discount the possibility of the cancellations being by a
Microsoft employee. I spoke to a very senior Microsoft person who was well
aware that security of Microsoft products would be examined and that chances 
are that bugs would be found. Point being that they would much prefer the
to be discovered by people who tell them about the bugs rather than people
who aim to exploit them.

	If you have pissed of the Church of Satan then what do you expect?
They will get what is comming to them sooner or later and I expect that it 
will take judicial and unpleasant form.

		Phill




Thread