From: “John A. Thomas” <jathomas@netcom.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: ad32b53807348959c4a4edfbb4deb5591c2195c1a69719b168c1d079653ecef4
Message ID: <Pine.3.89.9510291955.A29391-0100000@netcom8>
Reply To: <Pine.SOL.3.91.951030075604.12602E-100000@orb>
UTC Datetime: 1995-10-30 03:22:45 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 29 Oct 95 19:22:45 PST
From: "John A. Thomas" <jathomas@netcom.com>
Date: Sun, 29 Oct 95 19:22:45 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: EE Times on IDEA
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SOL.3.91.951030075604.12602E-100000@orb>
Message-ID: <Pine.3.89.9510291955.A29391-0100000@netcom8>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
On Mon, 30 Oct 1995, Eric Young wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Oct 1995, Anonymous wrote:
> > Electronic Engineering Times
> > Oct 23, 1995 p. 66
> >
> > T.R MADHUSUDAN SASTRY,
> > T. GANESAN, B.MADHUKAR
> > AND N. SRINIVASA
>
> > involved. The current implementation of Idea in ECB on Motorola's DSP
> > 56166 running at 60 Mhz supports up to 625 kbits/second in full-duplex
> > mode. That is 3.6 > times faster than using the DES algorithm.
>
> That last statement is rubbish. For most CPU's I've seen, IDEA is either
> the same speed as DES or a bit slower. There is no way that it is 3
> times faster that single DES.
My implementation of IDEA on the TI TMS320C26 DSP runs at 99 kbytes/sec.
I havent't tried DES, but comparing DES code on the 80x86 to the 'C26
instruction set, I think the speeds would probably be about the same.
Whatever, these speeds leave plenty of time for simple speech coding in a
voice encryption system.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
John A. Thomas | (214) 263-4351 | jathomas@netcom.com
Bowles & Thomas, L.L.P. | Voice | CompuServe 75236,3536
410 N.W Eleventh St. | (214) 262-6520 |
Grand Prairie, Tx 75050 | Fax | PGP public key available
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Return to October 1995
Return to “nobody@REPLAY.COM (Anonymous)”