From: Weld Pond <weld@l0pht.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: afaa95e76f79664af1536c3977aa7c9bd6a5d1ee755ae3e5e8a743ac71b151fb
Message ID: <Pine.BSD/.3.91.951012170741.12446A-100000@l0pht.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1995-10-12 21:18:00 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 12 Oct 95 14:18:00 PDT
From: Weld Pond <weld@l0pht.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 95 14:18:00 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: FWD: International Encryption Protocols
Message-ID: <Pine.BSD/.3.91.951012170741.12446A-100000@l0pht.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
To: "Frank O'Dwyer" <fod@fws.ilo.dec.com>
cc: firewalls@GreatCircle.COM (Firewalls Mailing List)
From: Justin Mason <jmason@iona.ie>
Subject: BoS: Re: International
Encryption Protocols
Frank O'Dwyer sez:
>After all, if the CoCom countries _weren't_ willing to sell each other
>crypto equipment, how could they spy on one another? :-)
>
>(Actually the :-) may not be necessary - I believe there was a story
> in the news recently about the UK 'authorities' snooping on Irish
> official traffic carried on UK-supplied equipment.)
Almost right -- it was the UK surveillance service (GCHQ) snooping on
Irish official traffic carried on US-supplied crypto equipment.
Apparently, the equipment in question had a "back door", courtesy of
the NSA; when GCHQ found out that the Irish govt were using this
equipment, they had only to ask their NSA pals for the details.
I only heard the details myself via a popular-science program on crypto
;), so the so-called back door may not have been a deliberately
weakened algorithm, it may have been a set of keys from an key-escrow
repository or some such.
--j.
Weld Pond - weld@l0pht.com - http://www.l0pht.com/~weld
L 0 p h t H e a v y I n d u s t r i e s
Technical archives for the people - Bio/Electro/Crypto/Radio
Return to October 1995
Return to “Weld Pond <weld@l0pht.com>”
1995-10-12 (Thu, 12 Oct 95 14:18:00 PDT) - FWD: International Encryption Protocols - Weld Pond <weld@l0pht.com>