From: “Erik E. Fair” (Time Keeper) <fair@clock.org>
To: Rich Salz <rsalz@osf.org>
Message Hash: bbc4d02593e5a07c855dbe5aa8127dbb57ec586a34fc8626fa094d9fb9acf481
Message ID: <v02110108ac99decdf8f0@[204.179.132.4]>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1995-10-05 19:14:32 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 5 Oct 95 12:14:32 PDT
From: "Erik E. Fair" (Time Keeper) <fair@clock.org>
Date: Thu, 5 Oct 95 12:14:32 PDT
To: Rich Salz <rsalz@osf.org>
Subject: Re: Rethinking the utility of netnews "cancel" control messages
Message-ID: <v02110108ac99decdf8f0@[204.179.132.4]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
At 10:34 10/5/95, Rich Salz wrote:
>I would like to put my corporate legal infrastructe on an internal secure
>conferencing system. News (with crypto-signed articles) is ideal.
>Without a "destroy all copies" concept I cannot do this.
> /r$
This, presumably, is a lawyer, discovery, lawsuit thing, right?
Erik
Return to October 1995
Return to ““Erik E. Fair” (Time Keeper) <fair@clock.org>”
1995-10-05 (Thu, 5 Oct 95 12:14:32 PDT) - Re: Rethinking the utility of netnews “cancel” control messages - “Erik E. Fair” (Time Keeper) <fair@clock.org>