From: Bill Sommerfeld <sommerfeld@orchard.medford.ma.us>
To: “baldwin” (Robert W. Baldwin) <baldwin@rsa.com>
Message Hash: c10c1dd65dbef209c2406b800bf937fe329af2459f4833fb53a686b73df224dc
Message ID: <199510250243.CAA00966@orchard.medford.ma.us>
Reply To: <9509248145.AA814557096@snail.rsa.com>
UTC Datetime: 1995-10-25 02:48:20 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 24 Oct 95 19:48:20 PDT
From: Bill Sommerfeld <sommerfeld@orchard.medford.ma.us>
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 95 19:48:20 PDT
To: "baldwin" (Robert W. Baldwin) <baldwin@rsa.com>
Subject: Re: 80 bit security from 40 bit exportable products
In-Reply-To: <9509248145.AA814557096@snail.rsa.com>
Message-ID: <199510250243.CAA00966@orchard.medford.ma.us>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> For example, a web client might fetch an S-HTTP page over an SSL
> protected link via a firewall that supports IPsec tunnels. That's
> three 40 bit keys protecting the data over the internet link (of
> course, this may not be equivalent to a 120 bit cipher, that depends
> on the details of the cipher systems and independence of the key
> setups).
C'mon Bob.. how long has it been since you picked a lock? :-)
Given the likely presence of known or verifiable plaintext at each
nesting level, a three-deep nesting of 40-bit ciphers like this
probably increases the strength to about, ohh, a 42 bit cipher.
- Bill
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.1
iQCVAwUBMI2kGrT+rHlVUGpxAQEKzwP+N7TlofhbYgHXycj7KCdpLhXFzZpnqlCB
ce/3ng9e4zN9G+lX/zpEeH/muhVkKFOwpaadYBKrn7Mu63dT0guCFNlApo9AMagU
xcLHex5AsKM3tWCayiTN5TP14bxEx2jSR54jSJIKsfulkpYRK0LYGj/fc5mSH8iP
r9qXBCrp7xA=
=QtVF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Return to October 1995
Return to “Jeff Barber <jeffb@sware.com>”