1995-10-07 - Re: CancelMoose = William Nagengast?

Header Data

From: Mark <mark@lochard.com.au>
To: tcmay@got.net (Timothy C. May)
Message Hash: ca7924376dc26c5821931cc278394eb15f6790fa079454455f4ca70729d46b90
Message ID: <199510071051.AA37781@junkers.lochard.com.au>
Reply To: <ac9b4284310210042b5f@[205.199.118.202]>
UTC Datetime: 1995-10-07 12:28:07 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 7 Oct 95 05:28:07 PDT

Raw message

From: Mark <mark@lochard.com.au>
Date: Sat, 7 Oct 95 05:28:07 PDT
To: tcmay@got.net (Timothy C. May)
Subject: Re: CancelMoose = William Nagengast?
In-Reply-To: <ac9b4284310210042b5f@[205.199.118.202]>
Message-ID: <199510071051.AA37781@junkers.lochard.com.au>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text


>>However, after a little further investigation, I don't think it really
>>is Mr. Nagengast. It actually appears that panix.com is running a
>>little remailer. As Dave Winer would say, cooooool.
>>You're right. My sincerest apologies.

>Well, presuming that the two anonymous parties are the same, I'm impressed
>that Anonymous was fairly graceful in his comments here.
>Too bad we don't who she or he is.

#define paranoia on

Just ask your local TLA that has traffic monitors on the up and down links of
all the remailers so they can track a piece of email from sender to recipient.
They will take the (relatively small) logs of the hour and pump out a name
for you.

#define paranoia off

:)
Mark
mark@lochard.com.au
The above opinions are rumoured to be mine.




Thread