From: liberty@gate.net (Jim Ray)
To: Kari Laine <buster@klaine.pp.fi>
Message Hash: ced9bc068d91d1a2472dda44c65ff276c4fe8d9f04a35a2b8fec07125262ee23
Message ID: <199510111433.KAA46776@tequesta.gate.net>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1995-10-11 14:40:23 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 11 Oct 95 07:40:23 PDT
From: liberty@gate.net (Jim Ray)
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 95 07:40:23 PDT
To: Kari Laine <buster@klaine.pp.fi>
Subject: Re: Elementrix POTP
Message-ID: <199510111433.KAA46776@tequesta.gate.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
I forwarded:
>> Unfortunately, and we really mean unfortunately, we can only reveal what
>>"it is" to people who agree to a non-disclosure arrangement while we're
>>patent pending. Otherwise we would have no problem revealing the whole
>>method. So far, every international expert who has reviewed the method
>>agrees (after many, many hours and days of trying to find holes) that POTP
>>really does what we say it does.
and Kari asked:
>Maybe you could name those experts who have inspected it - thanks.
Um, in an earlier post she mentioned the venerable Mr. Kahn and
someone else whose name I forget. I think I suggested (for cypherpunk
credibility) Carl, Wei, and maybe (for the "paranoid") Perry, but
I think she just wants to take her chances with us. I suggested
also PRZ, as this would maybe help his legal fund. :) Surprisingly,
she seemed unaware of any particular NSA interest in the prod.
I assured her that they were interested, and we agreed that since
the main office of the company was in Israel there was nothing to
do on this end. She did not respond to my nosy questions about
Israel govt. ownership, or ownership period. I suppose my own
combination of nosiness, crypto relative-cluelessness, and
insistence on my own use of PGP until something's provably better
<g> was beginning to annoy her, so she said, "Go tell them this!"
to get me out of her hair. I'm still curious about how her
technology claims to do its thing, but that's why I hang with
the C-punks (at least, one reason!). ;) "We" (not me) will
(eventually) get a copy and either rake it over the coals (likely,
IMO) or "endorse" it by failing to find a weakness (not so likely,
IMO). Sorry I can't say more, but I don't know more.
JMR
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2
Comment: Freedom isn't Freeh
iQCVAwUBMHvVXG1lp8bpvW01AQGwnAQAjk1+LFBuWaq5xovZySk43wNRKSviS57V
JTZCQVyFugsNTUQYaYP/h2UZ4hcCtJe0aePgENm5B2tBibp9MuP0skNG9m4v+O8A
cG5vei2TDMy7vh5tNWSnDdJ5dEjttGOU/nCEGC6JpDLvfdLICRrp7KdeCIY1bhc3
Up616khae4A=
=NTqn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Regards, Jim Ray
Ray's Corolary to Murphy's Law:
"You will be spared _NOTHING_." -- Peter C. Ray [my dad].
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
PGP key Fingerprint 51 5D A2 C3 92 2C 56 BE 53 2D 9C A1 B3 50 C9 C8
Key id. # E9BD6D35 James Milton Ray <liberty@gate.net> IANAL
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Help Phil! email zldf@clark.net or see http://www.netresponse.com/zldf
_______________________________________________________________________
Return to October 1995
Return to “liberty@gate.net (Jim Ray)”