From: “P.J. Ponder” <ponder@wane-leon-mail.scri.fsu.edu>
To: williams@va.arca.com
Message Hash: e2985ed5dbafa28ed7de3260c30907f36dde81156a5924b8ecbc01f0b8f3d8f3
Message ID: <Pine.3.89.9510172141.F23956-0100000@wane3.scri.fsu.edu>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1995-10-18 01:39:15 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 17 Oct 95 18:39:15 PDT
From: "P.J. Ponder" <ponder@wane-leon-mail.scri.fsu.edu>
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 95 18:39:15 PDT
To: williams@va.arca.com
Subject: Re: Security Spectra (Oops)
Message-ID: <Pine.3.89.9510172141.F23956-0100000@wane3.scri.fsu.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: 17 Oct 1995 14:13:10 GMT
From: Jeff Williams <williams@va.arca.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Security Spectra
P.J. Ponder writes:
> In your recent post to the cypherpunks mailing list you proposed a
> taxonomy of security weaknesses and vulnerabilities, adding that these
Please watch your attribution. Vlad Nuri proposed this rating scheme.
Oops. Sorry about that.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
On another matter, what's wrong with Mr. W of NetScape Communications
subscribing to this list, maybe even posting once in a while if he feels
like it, and in general just being a list subscriber like the rest of
us? Remember, as Mr. PM says - 'It's not a group, it's a mailing list'.
Mr. Weinstein's sig file says his posts are his own opinions, anyway.
NetScape biggies have certainly posted on this list before and probably
will again when they have something they want to send to the list, like a
press release. Cut Jeff some slack. (apology to international readers,
that's an Americanism for quit busting his chops.)
Return to October 1995
Return to ““P.J. Ponder” <ponder@wane-leon-mail.scri.fsu.edu>”
1995-10-18 (Tue, 17 Oct 95 18:39:15 PDT) - Re: Security Spectra (Oops) - “P.J. Ponder” <ponder@wane-leon-mail.scri.fsu.edu>