From: tien@well.sf.ca.us (Lee Tien)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: e86873da23baaac937f7dc37344aedeb2aadc43f0456c9f45ea5802be3250ce9
Message ID: <199510240149.SAA26129@well.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1995-10-24 01:49:50 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 23 Oct 95 18:49:50 PDT
From: tien@well.sf.ca.us (Lee Tien)
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 95 18:49:50 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: PA Remailer Concerns
Message-ID: <199510240149.SAA26129@well.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
What is the cite for this statute?
Lee
>At 11:47 PM 10/14/95 -0700, anonymous-remailer@shell.portal.com wrote:
>>Has anyone examined the legislative history associated with this statute?
>>
>>I would be surprised if they were singling out anonymous remailers. They
>may have had other concerns regarding phone abuse, e.g., long distance fraud.
>>
>>Then again, I could be full of it...
>>
>>
>Doesn't necessarily matter what the legislative history was. When some
>prosecutor trying to make a name for himself hooks onto this language to
>prosecute an anonymous remailer or other perceived miscreant, nobody will
>remember what the intent was. The casebooks are full of perversions of
>original intent.
>Jon Goldberg
Lee Tien
Attorney
tien@well.sf.ca.us
(510) 525-0817 voice
(510) 525-3015 fax
Return to October 1995
Return to “tien@well.sf.ca.us (Lee Tien)”
1995-10-24 (Mon, 23 Oct 95 18:49:50 PDT) - Re: PA Remailer Concerns - tien@well.sf.ca.us (Lee Tien)