From: Duncan Frissell <frissell@panix.com>
To: Black Unicorn <unicorn@polaris.mindport.net>
Message Hash: eb0ed4bac1af0f08de1ab64136a5ca641311ce43518ebcce7b4a330876091fd6
Message ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.951015191827.6604A-100000@panix.com>
Reply To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.951015141533.18407A-100000@polaris.mindport.net>
UTC Datetime: 1995-10-15 23:37:30 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 15 Oct 95 16:37:30 PDT
From: Duncan Frissell <frissell@panix.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Oct 95 16:37:30 PDT
To: Black Unicorn <unicorn@polaris.mindport.net>
Subject: Re: Crypto & Taxes [WAS Re: Cybersecurity]
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.951015141533.18407A-100000@polaris.mindport.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.951015191827.6604A-100000@panix.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
On Sun, 15 Oct 1995, Black Unicorn wrote:
> Were I an overseas employer, I would be quite happy to work in a
> "disinterested" jurisdiction and hire American workers to telecommute and
> issue their pay blindly to the number only or crypto bank account of their
> choice and promptly encrypt or lose the records.
Thanks for responding, Black (if I may call you Black), it means I don't
have to.
> Remember, there is an incentive for employERS as well as employees to
> flee the tax system of a nation that is manipulative of it. Employers
Also an incentive for jurisdictions to engage in a beneficial "Dutch
Auction" in which they offer lower and lower tax rates to attract
employers and employees.
> Who are you going to work for? The publisher who is based in New York
> and reports all payments, or the publisher who works in the Cayman
> Islands, reports nothing, and merely sells the manuscript to the big name
> publisher in New York after purchasing it blind from you?
And as the intellectual components of goods and services are increasingly
unbundled from the physical for efficiency reasons (greater range of
competitors made possible) more work can be done at a distance.
> When this is true, the most profitable venture in the United States will
> be retail smuggling. And as taxes are raised again and again, compliance
Fairly easy these days with drop shipping of goods by third parties and
the bypassing of retail distribution chains for more and more goods.
In any case, if goods end up being a smaller portion of Gross World
Product, taxes on them become less significant. The existence of
taxation of physical goods certainly tips things in favor of the untaxed
non physical goods and services.
Note that agriculture once made up 95% or more of GWP. It doesn't any
more. Non physical goods like entertainment, financial services, etc can
grow to dominate the world economy because they adapt well to cheap
distribution over the nets.
In the Progress and Freedom Foundation's Friction Free Capitalism, taxes
are a big part of the "friction" that is disintermediated.
DCF
Return to October 1995
Return to “Sandy Sandfort <sandfort@crl.com>”