1995-10-11 - Re: java security concerns

Header Data

From: Michael Froomkin <froomkin@law.miami.edu>
To: John Lull <lull@acm.org>
Message Hash: eb967463ed30d5760b4a876f4905768bf634c3062c23104320b30ba4d346ac6a
Message ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.951011115859.16896C-100000@viper.law.miami.edu>
Reply To: <199510101714.KAA07329@ix2.ix.netcom.com>
UTC Datetime: 1995-10-11 15:59:53 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 11 Oct 95 08:59:53 PDT

Raw message

From: Michael Froomkin <froomkin@law.miami.edu>
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 95 08:59:53 PDT
To: John Lull <lull@acm.org>
Subject: Re: java security concerns
In-Reply-To: <199510101714.KAA07329@ix2.ix.netcom.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.951011115859.16896C-100000@viper.law.miami.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


On Tue, 10 Oct 1995, John Lull wrote:

> Pardon my French, but if your lawyers make it impossible to do
> technical work correctly, isn't it time to get new lawyers?  I can't
> see how offering a reward for reporting bugs could possibly be
> objectionable to any rational lawyer.

I agree; I sent private mail to the parties saying in effect "if your 
lawyer can't structure this, it's time to get a new lawyer."

A. Michael Froomkin        | +1 (305) 284-4285; +1 (305) 284-6506 (fax)
Associate Professor of Law | 
U. Miami School of Law     | froomkin@law.miami.edu
P.O. Box 248087            | http://www.law.miami.edu/~froomkin
Coral Gables, FL 33124 USA | New address, but it's still just as hot here.






Thread