From: shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: ecd52744edfb164235fdfd16fd0b243c2e36de94729928b7d1f7aa0ed58021b0
Message ID: <199510180307.XAA23559@book.hks.net>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1995-10-18 03:09:22 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 17 Oct 95 20:09:22 PDT
From: shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green)
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 95 20:09:22 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] eCash reality !!
Message-ID: <199510180307.XAA23559@book.hks.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
In article <3R85cD1w165w@berserk.com>, usura@berserk.com (Alex de Joode) wrote:
> e-WAVE [issue 42], a dutch language electronic newsletter
> published by Riverland Publications, reports that DigiCash
> has reached agreement with a big US bank to make eCash real.
>
> DigiCash promised the 'scoop' to Newsweek, so in next monday's
> issue of Newsweek we will know wich bank that is. (They are also
> said to be talking with a Dutch or Belgian bank or financial
> institution).
>
> Since there has been cut a deal with the monetary powers I wonder
> if we get the whole anonymous ecash or a 'diluted spieces'.
It will have the same features as the Ecash used in the trial. Payer is
anonymous, but the payee isn't. I hope that I'll be able to finish some
perl scripts that add this badly needed, but for political reasons
missing, feature by the end of the month.
- ---
[This message has been signed by an auto-signing service. A valid signature
means only that it has been received at the address corresponding to the
signature and forwarded.]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2
Comment: Gratis auto-signing service
iQBFAwUBMIRvWioZzwIn1bdtAQHT8wF+JUheIIJxAV4ER1+lPddZhr744rR9N0/f
Ps0CIGNK9Ie16XVBMXx4J0OkKqCjP0PW
=HFWw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Return to October 1995
Return to “shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green)”