1995-10-24 - Re: [reformatted] how secure can privasoft be?

Header Data

From: Rich Salz <rsalz@osf.org>
To: owner-cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: ee2558290545aab92ec6e63bab9c2ab9bdb6a267337ccac73e101868c4cea5d3
Message ID: <9510240546.AA25372@sulphur.osf.org>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1995-10-24 05:51:06 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 23 Oct 95 22:51:06 PDT

Raw message

From: Rich Salz <rsalz@osf.org>
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 95 22:51:06 PDT
To: owner-cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: [reformatted] how secure can privasoft be?
Message-ID: <9510240546.AA25372@sulphur.osf.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


>their framework...it's the pluggable encryption that NSA has had such a hard
>time with but seems to be in favor of now.

What makes you say the NSA is in favor of pluggable crypto?

Thread

• Return to October 1995

• Return to “Rich Salz <rsalz@osf.org>”

• 1995-10-24 (Mon, 23 Oct 95 22:51:06 PDT) - Re: [reformatted] how secure can privasoft be? - Rich Salz <rsalz@osf.org>