1995-10-22 - Re: airport security

Header Data

From: Alan Horowitz <alanh@infi.net>
To: “Bob Bruen, MIT Lab for Nuclear Science” <BRUEN@mitlns.mit.edu>
Message Hash: f806e862bf418cd71ac85299042c7be9292d6c7650b8649761b1e89c5db21965
Message ID: <Pine.SV4.3.91.951021220213.17237G-100000@larry.infi.net>
Reply To: <951019071622.2000cf@mitlns.mit.edu>
UTC Datetime: 1995-10-22 02:05:45 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 21 Oct 95 19:05:45 PDT

Raw message

From: Alan Horowitz <alanh@infi.net>
Date: Sat, 21 Oct 95 19:05:45 PDT
To: "Bob Bruen, MIT Lab for Nuclear Science" <BRUEN@mitlns.mit.edu>
Subject: Re: airport security
In-Reply-To: <951019071622.2000cf@mitlns.mit.edu>
Message-ID: <Pine.SV4.3.91.951021220213.17237G-100000@larry.infi.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


WHy should airplane crashes be more of a cause for disseminating the 
Surveillance State than Greyhound Bus crashes?

I'd be more sympathetic to arguments about an airline's right to write 
it's contracts as it pleases. Though they are Common Carriers; they can't 
just offer Contracts of Adhesion at will.

Thread

• Return to October 1995

• Return to “Alan Horowitz <alanh@infi.net>”

• Return to ““Bob Bruen, MIT Lab for Nuclear Science” <BRUEN@mitlns.mit.edu>”

• 1995-10-19 (Thu, 19 Oct 95 04:17:28 PDT) - Re: airport security - “Bob Bruen, MIT Lab for Nuclear Science” <BRUEN@mitlns.mit.edu>
  • 1995-10-22 (Sat, 21 Oct 95 19:05:45 PDT) - Re: airport security - Alan Horowitz <alanh@infi.net>