cryptoanarchy.wiki

Arise, you have nothing to lose but your barbed wire fences!

1995-10-04 - Re: New version of my privacy enhanced www proxy is out

Header Data

From: Alan Barrett <barrett@iafrica.com>
To: Laurent Demailly <dl@hplyot.obspm.fr>
Message Hash: f9e6fd1a83b872b76068ee1a1deb801dd0824fdfd5fdad00a805f78dd5a739bb
Message ID: <Pine.NEB.3.91.951004225636.439y-100000@daisy.ee.und.ac.za>
Reply To: <9510042024.AA16962@hplyot.obspm.fr>
UTC Datetime: 1995-10-04 21:00:39 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 4 Oct 95 14:00:39 PDT

Raw message

From: Alan Barrett <barrett@iafrica.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Oct 95 14:00:39 PDT
To: Laurent Demailly <dl@hplyot.obspm.fr>
Subject: Re: New version of my privacy enhanced www proxy is out
In-Reply-To: <9510042024.AA16962@hplyot.obspm.fr>
Message-ID: <Pine.NEB.3.91.951004225636.439y-100000@daisy.ee.und.ac.za>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


> The proxy now issue  "Content-Checksums: md5=xxxxxx"
> headers for its stuff, I 'invented' that  syntax, any www guru to tell
> me if it already exists under another form ? (i checked the
> http docs at w3.org, found nothing)

RFC 1544 specifies the Content-MD5 header field for use with 
MIME-conformant messages.  It looks like this:

               Content-MD5:  Q2hlY2sgSW50ZWdyaXR5IQ==

--apb (Alan Barrett)

Thread