1995-10-05 - Re: Rethinking the utility of netnews “cancel” control messages

Header Data

From: Bryce <wilcoxb@nagina.cs.colorado.edu>
To: Rich Salz <rsalz@osf.org>
Message Hash: fa612679da08d3f81f821d945626c92dd601b473ab8c11f6c9f0ec7df7797b0a
Message ID: <199510051946.NAA03604@nagina.cs.colorado.edu>
Reply To: <9510051734.AA16383@sulphur.osf.org>
UTC Datetime: 1995-10-05 19:46:48 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 5 Oct 95 12:46:48 PDT

Raw message

From: Bryce <wilcoxb@nagina.cs.colorado.edu>
Date: Thu, 5 Oct 95 12:46:48 PDT
To: Rich Salz <rsalz@osf.org>
Subject: Re: Rethinking the utility of netnews "cancel" control messages
In-Reply-To: <9510051734.AA16383@sulphur.osf.org>
Message-ID: <199510051946.NAA03604@nagina.cs.colorado.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

> I would like to put my corporate legal infrastructe on an internal secure
> conferencing system.  News (with crypto-signed articles) is ideal.
> Without a "destroy all copies" concept I cannot do this.


Um..  You can't give people copies of something and then destroy all 
copies of that thing unless you can trust those people to destroy
*their* copies of it on your request.  If you *can* trust them to do
this, then the ratings-system solution I mentioned a minute ago will
work.  Just ask everyone to set their useragents to "delete" when they
encounter a "deleted, signed The Boss" mark on an article.


Regards,

Bryce

signatures follow


            "To strive, to seek, to find and not to yield."   
    <a href="http://ugrad-www.cs.colorado.edu/~wilcoxb/Niche.html">

                          bryce@colorado.edu                   </a>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2
Comment: Automatic PGP clearsigning under Unix with Bryce's Auto-PGP v1.0

iQCVAwUBMHQ2BfWZSllhfG25AQGD7QP9HtmYVNL0OHvlaPEXzRdFI/XXwzNVjjhK
QnDsK1Gxr9JXnTOORHjOuLNCp4L039UD3S43YU8Jhoo+/Gs1OHhUEK4fOlB9uV6G
QS4kvBSb00ygFSZSuEgyeGVEdlDhHBw9hA06lcc2UC11yU6TM7yZFn6ko3XRrIOR
0I3nIWalaWQ=
=FLQ9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----





Thread