From: Simon Spero <ses@tipper.oit.unc.edu>
To: Anonymous <nobody@REPLAY.COM>
Message Hash: 02b7a54dcb403ecf0b0fab161a58b2936a5ab5d641fd011d00c982325885a7e9
Message ID: <Pine.SOL.3.91.951104223658.7174A-100000@chivalry>
Reply To: <199511050620.HAA14046@utopia.hacktic.nl>
UTC Datetime: 1995-11-05 06:53:07 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 5 Nov 1995 14:53:07 +0800
From: Simon Spero <ses@tipper.oit.unc.edu>
Date: Sun, 5 Nov 1995 14:53:07 +0800
To: Anonymous <nobody@REPLAY.COM>
Subject: Re: lp (134.222.35.2)?
In-Reply-To: <199511050620.HAA14046@utopia.hacktic.nl>
Message-ID: <Pine.SOL.3.91.951104223658.7174A-100000@chivalry>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
On Sun, 5 Nov 1995, Anonymous wrote:
> > Notice that both messages went through an unnamed site -- 134.222.9.1 and
> > then a strangely-named site, "lp (134.222.35.2)" -- then through the same
> > Vienna, Virginia (USA) site ... and thereafter, on to their destination.
> > I.e., the second message went through Virginia to get from Switzerland to
> > Israel.
> >
> > The whois servers at the InterNIC and at nic.ddn.mil for MILNET Information
> > report, ``No match for "134.222.9.1". '' and `` No match for
> > "134.222.35.2".''
Yes, you've finally cottoned on to the secret NSA routing trick to
cleverly tap all traffic. Really clever the way they use two hosts in the
132.222 Class B network. Strange that traffic from EUNET should be using
that network, especially since it happens to be listed in the whois
database as being NET-EUNET-X25.
::chivalry:ses$ whois -h rs.internic.net 134.222
::European Unix Users Group (NET-EUNET-X25)
:: Kruislaan 413
:: NL-1098 SJ Amsterdam
:: NETHERLANDS
Return to November 1995
Return to “Simon Spero <ses@tipper.oit.unc.edu>”