1995-11-18 - Re: Design proposal: crypto-capable generic interface

Header Data

From: Aleph One <aleph1@dfw.net>
To: Adam Shostack <adam@lighthouse.homeport.org>
Message Hash: 09e7c1648a680b55358956c45d5bfe914e820d6fffb2dae663dfdea2cbff5dd4
Message ID: <Pine.SUN.3.90.951118131853.27991A-100000@dfw.net>
Reply To: <199511181441.JAA02040@homeport.org>
UTC Datetime: 1995-11-18 19:36:01 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 19 Nov 1995 03:36:01 +0800

Raw message

From: Aleph One <aleph1@dfw.net>
Date: Sun, 19 Nov 1995 03:36:01 +0800
To: Adam Shostack <adam@lighthouse.homeport.org>
Subject: Re: Design proposal: crypto-capable generic interface
In-Reply-To: <199511181441.JAA02040@homeport.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.90.951118131853.27991A-100000@dfw.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


On Sat, 18 Nov 1995, Adam Shostack wrote:

> 	A daemon per user, or per machine?  Either way, I think you
> run into problems on a big multi-user machine.  (Either its an extra
> process or two per person, or its a great target for attack &
> subversion.

	Not any more are target for attack than a shared library.

Aleph One / aleph1@dfw.net
http://underground.org/
KeyID 1024/948FD6B5 
Fingerprint EE C9 E8 AA CB AF 09 61  8C 39 EA 47 A8 6A B8 01 






Thread