From: “E. ALLEN SMITH” <EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU>
To: perry@piermont.com
Message Hash: 0d10dc705ce91862f7c66f9785a2b1113b9ec0eb50fc7afafb386d431f6419cf
Message ID: <01HY84MS8LTC8WYXJI@mbcl.rutgers.edu>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1995-11-29 23:59:49 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 30 Nov 1995 07:59:49 +0800
From: "E. ALLEN SMITH" <EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU>
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 1995 07:59:49 +0800
To: perry@piermont.com
Subject: Re: The future will be easy to use
Message-ID: <01HY84MS8LTC8WYXJI@mbcl.rutgers.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
From: IN%"perry@piermont.com" 28-NOV-1995 13:34:33.55
Jonathan Zamick writes:
> I can't agree. The model of a successful enterprise includes feedback from
> different levels of participants.
This isn't an enterprise. The government is not a participant except
by their own desire to interfere.
---------
One reason to incorporate a probable opponent into something is to see
what methods the opponent will likely use. For instance, their debating points
would be nice to know in advance (to the degree they aren't already); while
cyberpunks don't have much access to the mass media, that on the Net
(where a lot of the initial potential users are likely to be) is another
matter. Getting clues to their likely legal strategy may also be valuable.
On the other hand, letting them know too much may be a problem... of
course, I'm _certain_ the NSA, etcetera get copies of this list.
-Allen
Return to November 1995
Return to ““E. ALLEN SMITH” <EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU>”
1995-11-29 (Thu, 30 Nov 1995 07:59:49 +0800) - Re: The future will be easy to use - “E. ALLEN SMITH” <EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU>