From: eli@GS160.SP.CS.CMU.EDU
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 0e3732ed4f3290e844ba87bc3292cbe54050c323d7e91f8de5e41801e242d4b4
Message ID: <9511102101.AA27849@toad.com>
Reply To: <+cmu.andrew.internet.cypherpunks+kkcsTXG00UfAE0ynIq@andrew.cmu.edu>
UTC Datetime: 1995-11-10 21:30:33 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 11 Nov 1995 05:30:33 +0800
From: eli@GS160.SP.CS.CMU.EDU
Date: Sat, 11 Nov 1995 05:30:33 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Lotus Notes RSA Implementation Question
In-Reply-To: <+cmu.andrew.internet.cypherpunks+kkcsTXG00UfAE0ynIq@andrew.cmu.edu>
Message-ID: <9511102101.AA27849@toad.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
In article <+cmu.andrew.internet.cypherpunks+kkcsTXG00UfAE0ynIq@andrew.cmu.edu>
Charlie Kaufman writes:
>Notes V3 (the one currently deployed) uses 512 bit RSA keys in both
>the USA and exportable versions.
512-bit RSA is exportable? I'm surprised. It would be interesting
to CJR a known-secure binary for 512-bit RSA, attempting a little
differential cryptanalysis on the NSA's practices. A fair test would
require that you have the political clout of Lotus/IBM, though.
--
Eli Brandt
eli+@cs.cmu.edu
Return to November 1995
Return to “eli@GS160.SP.CS.CMU.EDU”
Unknown thread root