From: “James M. Cobb” <jcobb@ahcbsd1.ovnet.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 17c659efc2bbe31f4bc40a1d3f6a2c713f681397bf844a2e97b696e64bb95c6a
Message ID: <Pine.BSD.3.91.951122041137.28519G-100000@ahcbsd1.ovnet.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1995-11-22 09:52:42 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 22 Nov 1995 17:52:42 +0800
From: "James M. Cobb" <jcobb@ahcbsd1.ovnet.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 1995 17:52:42 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Junk E-Mail - Part 2
Message-ID: <Pine.BSD.3.91.951122041137.28519G-100000@ahcbsd1.ovnet.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Friend,
People are complaining about junk mail now. Wait until
they find out what real JUNK mail is...
11 21 95 Associated Press reports:
To make electronic mail as universally available in the
United States as telephones, the federal government and
business would need to work together, the [RAND] report
said.
RAND is known for generating options, but...
...the study recommended using public funding....
The government --I mean, RAND-- isn't too happy about
people owning their own computers:
As a way to reach people who don't own computers, the
study recommended that terminals be located in public
places -- street corners, community centers, libraries,
hotels -- just as pay phones are, so people can send and
receive electronic messages.
What if people find out that this "private study," as AP calls
it, is really JUNK mail from Joint Underhanded 'Net Kill-off?
Cordially,
Jim
NOTE. The NandO News website's URL:
http://www.nando.net
The newsstory's head- and datelines:
Study: Every American should have mailbox in
cyberspace
WASHINGTON (Nov 21, 1995 - 11:01 EST)
Its online filename: nation611_4.html
Return to November 1995
Return to ““James M. Cobb” <jcobb@ahcbsd1.ovnet.com>”
1995-11-22 (Wed, 22 Nov 1995 17:52:42 +0800) - Re: Junk E-Mail - Part 2 - “James M. Cobb” <jcobb@ahcbsd1.ovnet.com>