1995-11-04 - Re: Sources of randomness

Header Data

From: s1113645@tesla.cc.uottawa.ca
To: “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>
Message Hash: 17df65e1dac249e08fa9814281e24f6f7c534d16f59020c2244037cf804aff32
Message ID: <Pine.3.89.9511030915.B49857-0100000@tesla.cc.uottawa.ca>
Reply To: <199511031427.JAA08758@jekyll.piermont.com>
UTC Datetime: 1995-11-04 04:15:46 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 4 Nov 1995 12:15:46 +0800

Raw message

From: s1113645@tesla.cc.uottawa.ca
Date: Sat, 4 Nov 1995 12:15:46 +0800
To: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com>
Subject: Re: Sources of randomness
In-Reply-To: <199511031427.JAA08758@jekyll.piermont.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.3.89.9511030915.B49857-0100000@tesla.cc.uottawa.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain




On Fri, 3 Nov 1995, Perry E. Metzger wrote:

> I'll stick to recommending radioactive sources for now. Quantum
> mechanics is your friend, and detectors from places like Aware are
> cheap.
What prices have you got listed? Is the equipment sensitive enough to get 
lots of entropy from a normal environment or do you need artificial sources
of radioactivity? (easy, safe and cheap enough to get?)
Got any clues on random bits vs. time?

Someone said this was discussed before, I caught the thread on the 
detector being listed but not any discussion of the product itself. Could 
anyone post an approx date so I could go look it up on the archive?
Gracias.
Interesting stuff.





Thread