1995-11-17 - Re: Netscape rewards are an insult

Header Data

From: Jeff Weinstein <jsw@netscape.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 26fcc2706ce08ed3e3c9cc8e19cac113fc011e91689467285b9b44c35b0dd454
Message ID: <30AC4F87.7BDB@netscape.com>
Reply To: <199511160333.WAA08987@jekyll.piermont.com>
UTC Datetime: 1995-11-17 09:17:12 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 17 Nov 1995 17:17:12 +0800

Raw message

From: Jeff Weinstein <jsw@netscape.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Nov 1995 17:17:12 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Netscape rewards are an insult
In-Reply-To: <199511160333.WAA08987@jekyll.piermont.com>
Message-ID: <30AC4F87.7BDB@netscape.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Matthew James Sheppard wrote:
> I've got to note just one thing -- what about the Netscape LiveScript
> language?  is it opening up the same security can of worms as java?  I
> realise that it provides functionality specific to browsing only (no
> network/files) but the potential for bugs when you add another
> language must increase.

  One advantage that livescript has is that it was designed and
implemented by one individual, removing communication problems
as a possible source of holes.

  We are reviewing the set of reflected objects for possible security
problems, and will be taking a conservative approach to what we
include.

	--Jeff

-- 
Jeff Weinstein - Electronic Munitions Specialist
Netscape Communication Corporation
jsw@netscape.com - http://home.netscape.com/people/jsw
Any opinions expressed above are mine.





Thread