1995-11-02 - Re: Hit-and-Run Anonymous Posts (Re: “Dr.” Fred)
Header Data
From: Mark <mark@lochard.com.au>
To: tcmay@got.net (Timothy C. May)
Message Hash: 2f90f0c4ed46dcbfcf558a190b9d75f52912a6c839aeb334c5cbb49cb6bbe3a7
Message ID: <199511020706.AA20612@junkers.lochard.com.au>
Reply To: <acbcfb6801021004664c@[205.199.118.202]>
UTC Datetime: 1995-11-02 07:10:25 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 2 Nov 1995 15:10:25 +0800
Raw message
From: Mark <mark@lochard.com.au>
Date: Thu, 2 Nov 1995 15:10:25 +0800
To: tcmay@got.net (Timothy C. May)
Subject: Re: Hit-and-Run Anonymous Posts (Re: "Dr." Fred)
In-Reply-To: <acbcfb6801021004664c@[205.199.118.202]>
Message-ID: <199511020706.AA20612@junkers.lochard.com.au>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text
>Pseudonyms are another matter entirely. Some are classy (Pr0duct Cypher,
>Black Unicorn, Lucky Green), some are oafish (S Boxx), some are ephemeral.
>Persistence of the identity, as when backed by digital signatures, is
>important. (Though not essential, yet.)
You forgot (how could you?!??) BIFF!!!
:)
Mark
Thread
Return to November 1995
- Return to “Mark <mark@lochard.com.au>”
Return to “tcmay@got.net (Timothy C. May)”
- 1995-11-03 (Fri, 3 Nov 1995 17:52:17 +0800) - Hit-and-Run Anonymous Posts (Re: “Dr.” Fred) - tcmay@got.net (Timothy C. May)
- 1995-11-02 (Thu, 2 Nov 1995 15:10:25 +0800) - Re: Hit-and-Run Anonymous Posts (Re: “Dr.” Fred) - Mark <mark@lochard.com.au>