1995-11-26 - Re: Cypherpunk Certification Authority

Header Data

From: “James A. Donald” <jamesd@echeque.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 31f2431d53d81779ac4df56e0e9a4920a57b27b60e5755e90e00908b256e004f
Message ID: <199511261922.LAA16753@blob.best.net>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1995-11-26 19:30:01 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 27 Nov 1995 03:30:01 +0800

Raw message

From: "James A. Donald" <jamesd@echeque.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Nov 1995 03:30:01 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Cypherpunk Certification Authority
Message-ID: <199511261922.LAA16753@blob.best.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


At 01:53 AM 11/26/95 -0800, anonymous-remailer@shell.portal.com wrote:
>You'd rather sign before encryption??
>
>Doesn't that give you "known plain-text" to attack?

The signature is not known unless the whole message being signed is
known.

And any encryption scheme that is vulnerable to known plaintext attack
where only a part of the message is known, is worthless anyway.


 ---------------------------------------------------------------------
              				|  
We have the right to defend ourselves	|   http://www.jim.com/jamesd/
and our property, because of the kind	|  
of animals that we are. True law	|   James A. Donald
derives from this right, not from the	|  
arbitrary power of the state.		|   jamesd@echeque.com






Thread